Light posting for awhile since I’m taking a vacation in Colorado. Enjoy yourselves!
Glenn Murphy
Glenn Murphy Jr. was the Clark County Indiana Republican chairman as well as the head of the national Young Republicans. He stepped down, according to him because of a business opportunity, but more likely because he is accused of having molested another man while he slept. I haven’t commented on this story, not because I’m above it somehow — seems like when a guy who advocates family values and hewing to straight and narrow sexual mores as a political stance is (credibly if not conclusively) accused of committing sex acts on sleeping men on two different occasions (pdf – somewhat graphic), it’s news. My lack of commentary has more to do with the fact that other local blogs have it well in hand — most notably Taking Down Words which broke the story. ABC7Chicago.com: Clark County GOP chairman quits amid investigation. Advance Indiana has also been doing a good job on this story.
What prompted me to write anything about it was to grouse about the AP story on the subject that mentions reporting of The Evening News of Jeffersonville and The Courier-Journal of Louisville, Kentucky but, when it’s time to credit Taking Down Words, can only bring itself to mention that the police report related to the investigation was “also posted on a political Internet blog.”
No respect.
Update Murphy plead guilty in June 2008; served time in the DOC and was released in October 2008; and was registered as a sex offender as of March 2010.
State leaders urge local government to raise taxes
State leaders united to urge local communities to raise taxes. They didn’t use those words, of course.
Referring to three local income taxes authorized by the General Assembly, two of which limit or reduce property taxes, Gov. Daniels, Senator Long, and Rep. Bauer said:
Local government has been given an unprecedented opportunity to cut property taxes in record amounts, and it must act today. We are encouraging all Hoosier citizens to contact their city and county councils and urge them to begin the process to cut their property taxes now.
Neat idea – let’s have local government officials take the heat for raising taxes. We won’t mention that part of it. We’ll just talk about “property tax cuts.” This dovetails nicely with Gov. Daniels’ habit of blaming the property tax increase on local government run amok, nevermind that this is not actually the case.
I’m not totally opposed to the idea of replacing some property taxes with income taxes — so long as the swap isn’t structured so lower income people end up footing more of the bill. But, I’m a little irritated at how shabbily local government is treated by the State. I know crap flows downhill and all, but there ought to be limits.
Michael Specter on Spam
Michael Specter, writing for the New Yorker, has an article entitledDamn Spam. It’s a nice history of spam and the ongoing war between spammers and anti-spammers.
I first logged on to the Internet in the wake of the brouhaha over Canter & Siegel’s Green Card spam in 1994, so it was a bit of a trip down memory lane to read about them again.
Marion County Tax Lawsuit
The Indy Star has an article entitled Judge asked to decide on refunding tax bills discussing the Marion County lawsuit filed by county taxpayers with respect to property taxes. I think it’s a class action suit — though, I’d welcome correction if I’m wrong about that. The main issue in the suit was made moot by the DLGF’s decision to reassess the county and, for the time being, to pay taxes at the 2006 level.
Lawyers for the Plaintiffs requested that the suit be extended to request refunds for those taxpayers who have already paid tax at the 2007 level. Apparently the plan currently is to count over-payments as credits on the second tax installment in the fall.
Just a mercenary lawyer thinking out loud here, but I wonder if the desire for refunds instead of credits has anything to do with the potential fee that could be enjoyed by counsel for the Plaintiffs. Seems like it would be harder to get a cut of property tax credits than it would be to get a piece of a bunch of property tax refunds. But, maybe I’m just showing my ignorance here — I don’t know much at all about fee arrangements in class action suits.
Tracy Warner – Indiana Tax Facts
Looks like Tracy Warner, of the Fort Wayne Journal Gazette, couldn’t stay away from blogging entirely. He is authoring a blog called Indiana Tax Facts. (h/t Indiana Law Blog). One entry he has up is called Replacing property taxes.
There has been a lot of talk about taking away the property tax and replacing it with something else. That sounds like a pretty good idea, but becomes less so when you start doing the math. Apparently Sen. Ford has developed a program to do just that in order to analyze what would be necessary to replace the $5.65 billion in property taxes produced in 2006.
Using Ford’s calculator, Indiana would have to raise its sales tax to a nation-leading 8 percent plus dearly double income taxes from the current 3.4 percent to 6.4 percent – an increase of 88 percent – plus, for good measure, raise the corporate adjusted gross tax from the current 8.5 percent to 9.5 percent.
And those increases don’t replace local income taxes, which stand at 1 percent tax in Allen and some other counties.
For someone making $50,000 a year, the increase in the income tax alone would be $1,500. For someone making $75,000 a year, the increase would be $2,250. How many people with similar incomes would end up paying less than they do in property taxes?
The money is coming from somewhere. Folks ought to figure out whether they’ll do worse or better under a new system. If they’ll be doing worse, they’ll want to figure out whether their generosity is warranted.
[tags]Indiana property taxes[/tags]
Nels Ackerson website
(H/t Blue Indiana) Nels Ackerson, who is running in the Democratic primary to challenge Steve Buyer in Indiana’s 4th District has his website up.
According to his on the issues page, Mr. Ackerson favors:
Principled leadership to end partisan politics.
Government accountability.
Stronger national security.
A new course in Iraq.
Fixing education.
Affordable, quality health care.
New energy solutions.
Care for our veterans.
Reviving economic opportunity.
Protecting individual, constitutional rights.
Thumbs up! I like all of those things! But, I suppose most critical thinkers would also want to know Mr. Ackerson’s reasons and the means by which he proposes to achieve these things. So, if you’re a 4th District voter (or even if you’re not), you might want to head on over and take a look.
IU dumping Google for ChaCha
Via Slashdot: Indiana University Dumps Google for ChaCha.
“Come Monday, no more Indiana University searches will be powered by computer-driven Google. Only by people-powered ChaCha. The move was announced by new IU President Michael McRobbie, who until recently sat on ChaCha’s Board of Directors (5-29 SEC filing, PDF). IU will draft hundreds of librarians and IT employees to be ChaCha Guides for the university’s websites, although a FAQ accompanying IU’s press release tells librarians not to expect any checks for their efforts from ChaCha, which IU notes is backed by Amazon’s Jeff Bezos and Compaq founder Rod Canion.”
I took a quick spin around the Chacha search site, and the first thing I noticed was that there are a lot of advertisements in the search results. Big turn off.
Stagnation of wages
Paul O’Malley was kind enough to send me this link entitled Midwest Economy: Automotive wages in flux. I wanted to get a link up before I lost it in the shuffle. Basically, manufacturing wages have been stagnant since 1980. Automotive wages fare slightly better, but the Midwest’s share of automotive employment is falling.
My only editorial comment at the moment is that worker productivity has increased since 1980. Why hasn’t their earning power gone up in a corresponding fashion? The fruits of that extra production is going somewhere, I presume.
Hoosier Democrats cave on Bush eavesdropping bill
I don’t suppose that anyone associated with Baron Hill, Joe Donnelly, or Brad Ellsworth read this blog and care to offer an explanation for their vote on the bill to increase Bush’s wiretap powers? Bush hasn’t shown himself to be trustworthy and is even taken to blocking members of his administration from testifying before Congress.
I’m sure these Democrats will tell us either that they thought it was necessary to help prevent terrorism or that they were afraid of being painted as weak on terror. As to the former reason: based on what? Because the Bush administration told you so? Until this administration shows that it is trustworthy with matters that don’t involve our civil liberties, don’t believe the administration when it tells you that Alberto Gonzales needs more power.
As for the latter reason, there is an easy response: This administration can’t be trusted with power. If they want to prove themselves trustworthy, perhaps they could start by complying with subpoenas and seeking treatment for their collective bout of Alzheimers disease whenever they’re testifying before Congress.
If there are other explanations, I’d like to hear them.
- « Previous Page
- 1
- …
- 452
- 453
- 454
- 455
- 456
- …
- 689
- Next Page »