Nels Ackerson, Democratic candidate for Indiana’s 4th Congressional District has an opinion column in the Journal Review (out of Crawfordsville, I believe.) He criticizes the premise of No Child Left Behind. That policy does not promote education. It merely promotes the indicia of education. In other words, it doesn’t encourage teachers to teach kids to be smart. It encourages them only to produce students who can take a particular test. And, it does so at an expense. There are only so many hours in the day, and so every minute spent teaching to the test is a minute not spent teaching kids what they need to live. (Never mind other problematic aspects of NCLB — unequal and inadequate resources and disparate needs of student populations, for example).
To be sure, this isn’t the only time waster in a teacher’s life. My wife was formerly a teacher, and from her perspective, the non-education obligations imposed on teachers and schools were legion. The bureaucracy was formidable. Teachers are expected to be babysitters, police officers, and social workers as much as educators. Frequently, it seems, there is poor communication between school boards and teachers; leaving a school corporation in bad shape where, perhaps, the teachers and the board members are adequate, but school administration is not.








