Paul Krugman had a column in the New York Times entitled Gore Derangement Syndrome speculating on the reasons that Al Gore drives so many on the right to the brink of insanity:
Partly it’s a reaction to what happened in 2000, when the American people chose Mr. Gore but his opponent somehow ended up in the White House. Both the personality cult the right tried to build around President Bush and the often hysterical denigration of Mr. Gore were, I believe, largely motivated by the desire to expunge the stain of illegitimacy from the Bush administration.
And now that Mr. Bush has proved himself utterly the wrong man for the job — to be, in fact, the best president Al Qaeda’s recruiters could have hoped for — the symptoms of Gore derangement syndrome have grown even more extreme.
The worst thing about Mr. Gore, from the conservative point of view, is that he keeps being right. In 1992, George H. W. Bush mocked him as the “ozone man,†but three years later the scientists who discovered the threat to the ozone layer won the Nobel Prize in Chemistry. In 2002 he warned that if we invaded Iraq, “the resulting chaos could easily pose a far greater danger to the United States than we presently face from Saddam.†And so it has proved.
Krugman goes on to explain the detrimental effect that accepting certain basic facts about climate change would have on GOP dogma. It seems odd to me that, more and more over the past 10 or 15 years, on the national level, the choice between R & D is becoming basically a choice between faith-based policies and fact-based policies.