Just running a test. I’ve been having some issues with Movable Type that I’m trying to resolve. If this actually posts, then just take it as fair warning that posts may be sporadic until I get my technical issues resolved.
July Indiana Register
The July edition of the Indiana Register is available. I see that it addresses such spell-binding topics as:
Adds 312 IAC 18-3-19 under the article pertaining to entomology and plant pathology to regulate the giant African land snail (Achatina achatina (L.), Achatina fulica Bowdich, Achatina marginata, and other species of the family Achatinidae (Gastropoda)) as a pest or pathogen and to prohibit the possession, sale, release, or other distribution of
these snails in Indiana.
On the other hand, the Dept. of Local Government Finance appears to be entering into the rule making process on some fairly significant (albeit arcane to me) subjects. It intends to adopt rules on the following:
In some proposals that seem to scream “Budget Crunch,” the Office of the Children’s Health Insurance Program is apparently seeking to adopt rules to eliminate the time limit for collecting past due premiums and to increase the premium an individual’s family must pay to receive benefits under the Children’s Health Insurance Program.
Lots of action concerning professional licensure. Including rulemaking affecting architects, barbers, cosmetologists, manicurists, shampoo operators, pharmacists, plumbers, private detectives, engineers, accountants, and real estate agents.
Also, on July 11 at 11:00 a.m. at the Dept. of Insurance, a hearing will be conducted on a rule that would set the fees for medical record requests. Pages 1-10 = $1 per page; Pages 11-50 = $0.50 per page; and $0.25 per page for anything over 50. Also, the provider may charge a labor fee of $20 but, if it does so, it can’t charge for the first 10 pages. Also, the provider may charge the actual cost of postage. Also, the provider may charge $20 for certifying a record. (Maybe I’ll decline to pay the $20 for certification and just go ahead and subpoena the records administrator to come in and provide foundation testimony for medical records.)
Upcoming Interim committee events
The first meeting of the The Health Finance Committee is scheduled for today at 1:00 p.m. Tentative agenda items include:
1) Malpractice costs
2) Infertility issues
3) Moratorium/Certificate of Need
4) Enactment of legislation affecting the Department of Health
5) FSSA outside audit
The second meeting of the Legislative Council is scheduled for July 6, 2005 at 10:30 A.M. The agenda includes, “presentation of the county property tax reassessment project.”
The Environmental Quality Service Council is scheduled to meet at 9:30 a.m. on July 19, 2005. I didn’t see any agenda items online.
Some press
Hey, look at that, this blog got a little press. A very little press. But hey, I’ll take it. Kemplog and Big Eastern also got mentions.
One passage caught my eye:
While some local blogs spark political conversations, most blogs — including Gardner’s — get little formal response. So, this area’s blog scene may have a ways to go before it can be considered a forum for democratic debate like the historic town hall meeting.
“Blogs make a lot of sense when you have hundreds, if not thousands or tens of thousands, of people visiting the site or when there’s a lot of news,” said Ed Cohen, associate editor of Notre Dame Magazine, who is considering running for the Democratic nomination for Congress from Indiana’s Second Congressional District. “I just don’t think there’s that much interest in the day-to-day opinions of the mayor of South Bend or even our local congressmen.”
I don’t know in what context Mr. Cohen was asked whether blogs make sense, but if he was commenting about blogs in a general sense, I disagree with him. For my own part, I do this primarily because I like writing, and I like creating a database where I can search for news and the like that I found interesting in the past. For example, if I want to take a look at how the Daylight Saving Time issue progressed through the session, I just go here. In addition, even though relatively few comments are left by readers, even relatively obscure blogs like my own seem to cultivate a readership. I’ve been averaging about 250-300 unique visitors per day; 8,000 – 9,000 visits per month; and 20,000 pages served per month. — I’m not sure how well my statistical software screens out spam and robots, but I think that number is after the software makes the effort. I’d say there are about 20 people I know of who have made me aware of the fact that they read. Certainly this would not be sufficient for commercial success. And it’s likely to have only the tiniest bit of political influence. If those are the metrics being used by Mr. Cohen, then I suppose this doesn’t make sense. But, from the perspective of simply enjoying the process of creation and adding somewhat to a sense of community, it makes sense for me to do as a hobby.
On the other hand, more sleep would likely “make sense” as well.
The Declaration of Independence
Every 4th of July, I like to reread the Declaration of Independence. This helps me remember what the Founders had in mind when they set forth on their insurgency against King George, and it reminds me of what lies at the root of all that makes this country great. As you may recall, the Declaration begins:
IN CONGRESS, JULY 4, 1776
The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of AmericaWhen in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. –That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. –Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.
It’s this breaking of bonds, and the reasons therefore, that make the 4th of July important. It’s not just thanking the military or our forefathers. It’s not just the flag. It’s not just the fireworks. These are all part and parcel of the larger idea.
The larger idea is that individuals are self-determining beings. Liberty is their natural right and their natural condition. Authority should not be suffered solely for it’s own sake. Proper government is designed and maintained by the citizenry, it is not revealed and handed down from on high.
I am thankful that the founding fathers were products of the political culture of the Enlightenment and not of our own day. I cannot imagine that our current Representatives would pledge their lives, their fortunes, and their honor to boldly break from Authority that no longer serves its purpose: to secure the rights of the citizens.
So, when you are at the parades and the picnics, revel in the patriotism, thank the troops, love our country, but think about the Declaration and the principles that are more important than any of those things. The full text follows.
IN CONGRESS, JULY 4, 1776
The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of AmericaWhen in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. –That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. –Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.
He has refuted his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.
He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.
He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their Public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.
He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.
He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected, whereby the Legislative Powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.
He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.
He has obstructed the Administration of Justice by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary Powers.
He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.
He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.
He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.
He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power.
He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:
For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:
For protecting them, by a mock Trial from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:
For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:
For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:
For depriving us in many cases, of the benefit of Trial by Jury:
For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences:
For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies
For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:
For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.
He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.
He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.
He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation, and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & Perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.
He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.
He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.
In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.
Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred. to disavow these usurpations, which would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.
We, therefore, the Representatives of the United States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States, that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. –And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.
–John Hancock
New Hampshire:
Josiah Bartlett, William Whipple, Matthew ThorntonMassachusetts:
John Hancock, Samuel Adams, John Adams, Robert Treat Paine, Elbridge GerryRhode Island:
Stephen Hopkins, William ElleryConnecticut:
Roger Sherman, Samuel Huntington, William Williams, Oliver WolcottNew York:
William Floyd, Philip Livingston, Francis Lewis, Lewis MorrisNew Jersey:
Richard Stockton, John Witherspoon, Francis Hopkinson, John Hart, Abraham ClarkPennsylvania:
Robert Morris, Benjamin Rush, Benjamin Franklin, John Morton, George Clymer, James Smith, George Taylor, James Wilson, George RossDelaware:
Caesar Rodney, George Read, Thomas McKeanMaryland:
Samuel Chase, William Paca, Thomas Stone, Charles Carroll of CarrolltonVirginia:
George Wythe, Richard Henry Lee, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Harrison, Thomas Nelson, Jr., Francis Lightfoot Lee, Carter BraxtonNorth Carolina:
William Hooper, Joseph Hewes, John PennSouth Carolina:
Edward Rutledge, Thomas Heyward, Jr., Thomas Lynch, Jr., Arthur MiddletonGeorgia:
Button Gwinnett, Lyman Hall, George Walton
Scientist says innovation is slowing
According to an article in the New Scientist, physicist Jonathan Huebner, a physicist at the Pentagon’s Naval Air Warfare Center in China Lake, California, says “the rate of technological innovation reached a peak a century ago and has been declining ever since. And like the lookout on the Titanic who spotted the fateful iceberg, Huebner sees the end of innovation looming dead ahead.”
he plotted major innovations and scientific advances over time compared to world population, using the 7200 key innovations listed in a recently published book, The History of Science and Technology (Houghton Mifflin, 2004). The results surprised him.
Rather than growing exponentially, or even keeping pace with population growth, they peaked in 1873 and have been declining ever since (see Graphs). Next, he examined the number of patents granted in the US from 1790 to the present. When he plotted the number of US patents granted per decade divided by the country’s population, he found the graph peaked in 1915.
. . .
He likens the way technologies develop to a tree. “You have the trunk and major branches, covering major fields like transportation or the generation of energy,” he says. “Right now we are filling out the minor branches and twigs and leaves. The major question is, are there any major branches left to discover? My feeling is we’ve discovered most of the major branches on the tree of technology.”
I have major reservations with this theory. First is the connection between population and technological advance. I’m not sure the two are related. We could plot technological advances against number of Star Wars DVD sales per year and, clearly, the year 1900 would have a much better ratio than today. The second is that time and time again over the course of history, we’ve heard people suggest we’ve “discovered it all.” That’s usually right before a major technological explosion takes place. (Kind of like you should stuff your money under the mattress when you hear someone talking about how we’ve tamed the cyclical market.)
Indy Star on “Ground Rules” for Nomination
The Indianapolis Star wants everyone to play nice when it comes to the upcoming nomination battle to replace Justice O’Connor.
The Star mentions that the Senate confirmed Ginsburg 96-3. It doesn’t mention that President Clinton sought the advice of Republican Judiciary Committee leader Orrin Hatch before submitting Justice Ginsburg’s nomination. If President Bush seeks the advice of Senator Lehey before submitting the next nomination, I’m sure there would be a similar result. But that’s not going to happen.
The Star essentially asks the Left to tie its hands behind its back. No heated rhetoric. No litmus tests. No filibusters. Only “judicial qualifications” but no indication of what to use as a standard. I posted the following over at a few of the blogs I frequent, but I’m already tired of the nomination process.
We’ll hear a lot about “activist judges,” but as the estimable Mr. Brayton has pointed out, that combination of words has basically become meaningless.
The left will cherry-pick all of the worst bits from the nominee’s background such that I won’t really be able to trust their assessment of whether this guy (or gal) is a loon or merely a person of sound jurisprudence with some poorly turned phrases in his or her opinions. By the same token, the right would loudly proclaim that a pro-life ham sandwich was the second coming of Blackstone, Marshall, Hand, and Holmes all rolled into one if it was nominated by George Bush.
Television “news” will treat me to an endless array of “experts” determined not to provide any substantive analysis but who merely throw buzzwords at each other between Pepsi ads.
So, I’m already tired.
Indy Star on Confusing Fireworks Law
This is an annual ritual. Every year, there are complaints about how confusing and ineffective the fireworks law is in Indiana. Every year, nothing is done about it. I personally don’t have a strong feeling about which fireworks should be legal. I launched bottle rockets from the seat of a moving 10-speed and lived to tell the tale, but I certainly wouldn’t recommend such behavior. But the law should be clear. And our law, is crap.
The Indianapolis Star has commented on this before, and so have I. The Indianapolis Star has an article today entitled Fireworks law called confusing. According to the article:
Igniting fireworks is banned in Indiana with the exception of sparklers, noisemakers and a few other varieties. But illegal fireworks, such as bottle rockets and firecrackers, can be sold to people who promise to take them out of the state. Buyers also can agree to set them off in one of the state’s 25 designated areas run by firefighters.
[State Fire Marshal] Johnson said few people keep those promises. And police can’t stop “thousands of simultaneous crimes occurring in every corner of the community, every corner of the state,” he said.
Under the provisions of the law, I’m not even sure that local police have jurisdiction to enforce the law. I believe it was written to give the state fire marshal — and only the fire marshal — authority to enforce that particular law.
The law is here. It reads like a pretzel. That’s not an accident. As I said before,
In Indiana, where our legislation tends to be clearly written –even if you disagree with the policies,– a law doesn’t get this obfuscatory by accident. There was an intent to have this law be full of sound and fury, but signify nothing.
So, the Indy Star is being overly kind when it calls the law “flawed.” The structure of our fireworks law is an abomination.
Sing it Brother
John Cole (not a Democrat, btw) gets it when it comes to Brother Dobson’s wing of the Republican Party and he provides this inspired rant. Here’s a taste:
If anyone really thinks Dobson and Tony Perkins care about the Constitution, they need to reassess their faculties. They care about the Constitution in the context that they think liberal activist judges are robbing them from what is rightfully theirs (and in fairness, sometimes they are right). They really care about displaying the Ten Commandments wherever and whenever because we are a “Christian Nation.”
They care about inserting themselves into family matters of life and death. They care about keeping drugs out of your hands, even if they ease pain caused by illness. They care about treating homosexuals like second-class citizens. They care about prayer in school and keeping “under God” in the Pledge of Allegiance. They care about ending abortion. They care about making divorces really difficult to obtain. They care about inserting religion into schools and ending the teaching of evolution. They care about a whole host of things, but Constitutional deference is not one of them.
South Bend Tribune: Forum attenders favor Central Time
An article from the South Bend Tribune entitled SouthBendTribune.com: Central time clear favorite suggests that those individuals attending a time zone forum in South Bend strongly favored Central Time. This contrasted with a poll taken by the Tribune which showed opinion about evenly divided. My guess is that this is going to be similar to the gun control debate and other primarily emotional issues — one side will be strongly committed to their position and will vote on that basis. The other side will be less passionate and won’t cast votes based on that issue alone. My guess is that central-timers and anti-DST advocates will be more likely to base their vote on the time issue than will eastern timers and pro-DST advocates. Just my guess. It also bears mentioning that this forum was not held by the U.S. Dept. of Transportation which has jurisdiction over the issue. The Daniels administration has said it expects the USDOT to conduct hearings. As best I can tell, the USDOT has been absolutely silent.
- « Previous Page
- 1
- …
- 629
- 630
- 631
- 632
- 633
- …
- 689
- Next Page »