Once again, the General Assembly is considering legislating a scientific fact. Back in the 19th century, the General Assembly attempted to legislate the value of pi. Now, they’re giving another shot at trying to define when human life begins and, perhaps worse, compelling a woman’s doctor to endorse the General Assembly’s fiat. (See my prior blog entry on the subject here.) Rich Callahan, writing for the Associated Press, has an article entitled Abortion bill sets when life begins which discusses SB 172. The bill was heard in Senator Miller’s Committee on Health and Provider Services. No votes were taken after the hearing, but it might come up for a vote next week.
The bill requires a physician inform a pregnant woman that a fetus might feel pain, and also give notice to the patient in writing at least 18 hours before an abortion concerning the availability of adoptions, concerning physical risks to the woman in having an abortion, and stating that human physical life begins when a human ovum is fertilized by a human sperm.
At the hearing, the bill drew criticism from at least two religious groups, Rev. Michael D. Mather of Broadway United Methodist Church and David Sklar and Linsdsey Mintz of the Jewish Community Relations Council:
[He] told the committee that not even fellow Methodists agree on when human life begins. As written, Mather said the legislation represents one religious viewpoint — the belief that human physical life commences when a sperm fertilizes an egg.
“I believe that what is matter of faith should not be a matter of law,” he told the panel.
David Sklar, an intern at the Jewish Community Relations Council, read a statement by the Indianapolis group that called the bill’s declaration that life begins at conception “blatantly indifferent” to diverse religious beliefs, including Jewish tradition.
“This bill establishes a particular religious opinion as legal fact, and sets a very dangerous precedent violating the separation of church and state,” said the statement by Lindsey Mintz, the group’s director of government affairs.
Technorati Tags: sb172-2007, abortion

