ProPublica has put up a summary of the spending included in the stimulus bill.
Router/Comcast Nonsense
I woke up this morning, and my home computer wasn’t connecting to the Internet. My dear wife called the folks at Comcast support. They had her do some stuff which ended with her computer not going through the router but being online with the modem connected directly to her computer. Presto! It’s not us, Comcast, it must be Linksys. (It’s always the other guy when you call your Internet Service Provider.)
Fortunately, I just went through actual router hell at work and have come to know the symptoms of a bum router. Mine at home just didn’t look the part. Fortunately, I found this post which described very accurately the interaction between my wife and Comcast support. That was followed by finding this Yahoo Answer with very much the same sort of solution as the original link suggested.
Basically, it involves figuring out what MAC address your computer is using to identify itself to Comcast. Then going into your router configuration and having your router basically identify itself as that computer with which Comcast is playing nice. Then, switch your computer to the router, router to the modem, and presto! Internet! Saved myself $100 or whatever for the router Comcast said was the problem.
February 12, 1809 – Lincoln and Darwin Born
February 12, 1809 was a pretty good day for the world – Abraham Lincoln and Charles Darwin were born. The Lafayette Journal & Courier had an article on Darwin with a passage that caught my attention:
“I really believe that creationism and science are hand-in-hand,” said Chris Johns, principal of First Assembly Christian Academy in Lafayette. “Just as some who see science through Darwinism.”
. . .
“We do bring up both sides,” Johns said.
“We teach both sides — and quite honestly, we believe the creationism side.”
Johns said while students are taught God had a guiding hand in the world’s creation, as opposed to the big bang theory, it is not a rejection of science.
Evolution holds that the Earth is billions of years old and that all life, including humans, evolved from simple forms through a process of natural selection.
In particular, the not believing in the Big Bang thing caught my eye – and that’s because of a parenting issue with which I was presented a couple of weeks ago. I had told Cole, my 5 year old, about the Big Bang. A day or two later, he said he told his teacher about it and she told him “he wasn’t telling the truth.” Now, some of this is probably just a translation issue by the 5 year old. I don’t think his teacher called him a liar. But, I think she did try to tell him that the Big Bang Theory wasn’t true. A few days later, he said something like “God made all snowflakes different.” I was fairly abrupt in telling him that it wasn’t God that made the snowflakes, but rather a natural combination of cold and water. Nature is a wonder on its own, we don’t need to theorize a God to add to it. I haven’t raised a fuss with the teachers or the school because it’s a church where the pre-school is located. They said that religion wasn’t part of their curriculum, aside from a thank you song at snack time, but some teachers are apparently more into proselytizing than others. But, you go to a church, you get God. I get that.
Another thing about that passage that struck me was the conflation of the age of the earth with evolution. That strikes me more as a matter of geology than evolution. The Young Earthers are more perplexing to me than the anti-evolutioners. Wholesale rejection of science in the name of believing chapters of the Bible written from the oral traditions of bronze age shepherds is absolutely baffling to me.
So, anyway, 200 years ago Darwin was born, and he wrote a book that helped us better understand the world around us. That bent a lot of folks out of shape, but I’m happy he did it. Happy birthday Charles. Thoughts on Lincoln will have to wait.
A little press
The Lafayette Journal & Courier ran a story on the partial victory by the police officer defendants in a suit by a woman who was injured as police fired at a fleeing vehicle operated by the man who had abducted the woman and murdered the woman’s son.
The suit alleged that the police officers violated the woman’s constitutional rights and also that she was injured through their negligence. A federal judge granted the officers’ summary judgment motion on the constitutional claims — which are a federal matter — but declined jurisdiction on the remaining state claims and remanded those back to the state court. I represent the county and the county officers sued and, therefore, was briefly mentioned in the story. The federal judge’s opinion is here (pdf) . Among other things, the judge found:
“Here, the defendants were faced with a dangerous and violent felon, who had just broke into Ms. Browell’s residence and shot her son, and was attempted to resist arrest and flee the scene by driving erratically through the neighborhood[.]” . . .
“Clearly the officers were attempting to apprehend the likely armed Lile, a legitimate governmental interest, and not intending to harm Ms. Browell.”
. . .
Viewing the record in the light most favorable of Mrs. Browell, she simply cannot demonstrate that defendants violated her constitutional rights. To the contrary, the uncontested facts reveal that defendants’ use of force in attempted to subdue Mr. Lile, a fleeing felon who had shot and ultimately killed Ms. Browell’s son and held her unconsciously captive, was reasonable, and no jury could find otherwise.
SB 90 – So You Want to Murder Your Fetus?
SB 90 passed the Senate on a vote of 39 – 11. Prior to performing an abortion, the bill requires a woman’s physician to tell her that her fetus might feel pain; that she can put it up for adoption (and maybe even get that paid for if she’s just murdering her fetus because she’s cheap); that she might die if she gets an abortion; and that human life begins at conception.
I for one want to thank the Indiana Senate for settling the vexatious philosophical question of when human life begins. Now, if they could get back to legislating the value of pi so it didn’t have all of those digits.
Government For the Rich
Tom Coyne, writing for the Louisville Courier Journal, had an article covering President Obama’s visit to Elkhart. One quote, in particular, stood out to me. Speaking of the stimulus plan:
“I don’t think it’s going to help enough of the right people,” said Sue Wyatt, 64, of Bristol, who works as a hotel manager and a hair stylist. “I think it’s going to give more to the rich and a lot less to the poor.”
It’s hard to blame her for this perception, given the talk of the TARP funds pouring into the hands of, by and large, the same bankers who were instrumental in getting us into this mess; funds being used to subsidize their lavish lifestyles — lavish, in particular, I would suppose compared to a woman in Bristol holding down two jobs. The funds also are pouring into the hands of companies who simply can’t obtain this stunning results without paying their CEOs more than $500,000 per year.
Negative perception of government is inevitable, I suppose. First, it is a very large organization, and with such organizations, the failures are going to be noticed more than the successes. Second, you have at least one of the major parties proclaiming that government is the problem and often seeming dead set on proving that very thing after getting elected.
Going unnoticed, however, are all the ways in which government works and makes our lives better. Notice those property rights you have? Like them? Me too. But, here is the thing. There are no property rights without government. Instead of property rights, without government, you have property only so long as you can hold it by force. I’ve used this one often in the past, but only because it gets overlooked: without government, you have a Hobbesian state of nature, the war of all-against-all leading to lives that are solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short. Government courts help us enforce contracts and other property rights. Government employees with guns will help enforce court orders if not complied with “voluntarily.” Those same government employees with guns will help you out if someone is trying to take your stuff by force. The point being that the “no government” crowd often seems delusional in that they just think people will magically refrain from stealing your stuff. In fact, it wouldn’t even be “stealing” inasmuch as there would be no law prohibiting the strongest from acquiring as much stuff as they could until such time as a bigger, better armed mob came along to take it from them.
Government does other fundamental things such as regulating weights and measures, organizing and maintaining drainage for a jurisdiction, maintains the roads, maintains traffic controls, clears the snow, takes away the trash, defends the country, helps keep the air and water clean, provides for a minimum of workplace safety, regulates the currency, provides for a creator’s monopoly on intellectual property — just to name a few off the top of my head.
This is not to say that government is a universal panacea — but neither is it the universal toxin we seem to hear about from some quarters. For those who, however grudgingly, acknowledge that government can do some good — we’re now just haggling over the price. How much government is good and why?
I’ll have to leave my rant here. I had a notion to forge on into some discussion of the New Deal and how it made the lives of ordinary Americans better than they had it before FDR and how a certain contingent of high society still hates FDR for committing treason against his class. But, speaking of property rights has reminded me that I have to head to work and try to acquire some of my own. Maybe later.
More on Oxley’s DUI
Harold Adams, writing for the Lousville Courier Journal has more on former Rep. Oxley’s DUI on Friday. He hit a parked car while driving with a BAC of 0.17. He says he “made an error in judgment. . . I take full responsibility. I make no excuses, and I expect no special treatment.”
Gov. appoints P. Thomas Snow as Alcohol & Tobacco Commission Chairman
The Richmond Palladium-Item is reporting that Judge Thomas Snow, currently in Wayne Superior Court 1, will be appointed chair of the Alcohol & Tobacco Commission. Normally this wouldn’t mean much, but Judge Snow is the father of one of my sister’s best friends growing up. So, from that perspective, it’s a good appointment. And, by all accounts, Judge Snow is “the kind of person who makes any institution he joins a great deal better, and that which he leaves, saddened.”
Economy & Military Conflict
The Associated Press had an article entitled “Indiana seeing a rise in military recruitment,” which is ostensibly due to the problems with our economy. This made me think of the historical notion that bad economic times lead to military conflict. If nothing else, countries have a surplus of able-bodied citizens and have to direct their energy one way or another in a way that keeps the existing government in power. I’m not especially concerned that unemployment in the U.S. will lead to increased saber rattling by us — we have an uncommonly stable government — but look for increased hostility around the world as other economies go in the tank.
Oxley Arrested on DUI Charge
Former Representative and Democratic Lt. Governor candidate Dennie Oxley was arrested on a DUI charge Friday, allegedly with a BAC over 0.15.
I have no idea of the details of Oxley’s incident, but every time I see a public figure arrested for a DUI, it suggests to me that hammering on the “don’t drink” side of the equation is insufficient. We need alternatives to driving our own vehicles to get around – whether that’s better public transit or zoning for corner pubs or something else, I don’t know.
- « Previous Page
- 1
- …
- 128
- 129
- 130
- 131
- 132
- …
- 253
- Next Page »