Reasoned Analysis at Hoosier Access

by Doug on September 20, 2008

Hoosier Access on the change we can expect if Obama is elected (h/t RedHawk Hoosier):

And the bit about getting into people’s faces – that’s right in line with the mindset of the baggy pants wearing crowd. Get into their face, maybe wave a shank or shiv, flash some signs.

You’ll see change in January if the Presidential limo starts sporting spinner wheels, fuzzy dice, and a BOOMING subwoofer mounted in the trunk blasting Ludacris. That change, is what will be left in your pocket after the Government gets done shaking you down for every last dollar you have.

Thuggz, baggy pants, shanks, shivs, spinner wheels, fuzzy dice, booming subwoofer, gang signs. Oh I get it! Barack Obama is half black. Of course he’s going to act like a gangsta if he gets in the (ahem) “White” House. Ah, but what can we expect in terms of watermelon and fried chicken? Big lips? Nappy hair? Cadillac driving welfare queens? Gold grills & pimp suits? Sleeping with white women!

What a racist piece of shit.

Update The offending passages, quoted above, have been removed from the original post.

{ 25 comments… read them below or add one }

stAllio! September 20, 2008 at 16:11 +00006

i wear baggy pants, but i haven’t shanked anyone yet. (i’m saving it for a special occasion.)

BrianW September 20, 2008 at 18:33 +00006

Im gonna leave out any extra commentary to make sure an avoid an ulcer.

Just “ditto” Doug… just “ditto.”

Marti Abernathey September 20, 2008 at 18:40 +00006

Maybe we should break out the redneck generalizations. After all, he did misquote Jefferson with something Franklin said. I was going to comment there, then thought, why? I’m not going to waste my time with someone that doesn’t even source their quotes, much less lay out a reasoned argument.

tripletma September 20, 2008 at 21:18 +00006

Yuck. I went over to Hoosier Access and now I have to take a shower…

Their response to the pushback from the comment? – “but, but they treated Sarah Palin so much worse……”

T September 20, 2008 at 23:33 +00006

Sarah Palin’s a gift to Democrats. The Hoosier Access klavern is too dumb to realize it.

RedhawkHoosier September 21, 2008 at 0:19 +00006

It seems after Hoosier Access’ valiant defense of what was written in a new post, they quietly edited out the racist paragraph I quoted. Nice try but we all know what was originally written. Unreal.

tumbleweed September 21, 2008 at 5:17 +00006

Man, that’s some funny shit!

Wilson46201 September 21, 2008 at 6:01 +00006

Hoosier Access posted a weak defense of the offending posting but then proceeded to slam Gary Welsh by whining that unlike some bloggers, at least they weren’t claiming Obama is a homosexual Muslim or not a US citizen. These claims have been persistently peddled by that petty bigot and smalltown gossip on AdvanceIndiana.
.
You know you’re out in la-la land when even Hoosier Access calls you a deranged extremist!

tumbleweed September 21, 2008 at 6:49 +00006

“…deranged extremist!”

That’s a good one, Wilson. No irony, huh?

Thomas September 21, 2008 at 8:08 +00006

They always delete this stuff when they realize that Mitch and the gang — no, not THAT kind of gang — won’t be able to make cute YouTube videos for them anymore if they openly express their latent racism. The GOP playbook provides plenty of codewords to get that stuff out, but some people just don’t play by the rules…

tumbleweed September 21, 2008 at 9:29 +00006

Yes clearly Mitch was behind this. The GOP’s “latent racism” is only overshadowed by the monolithic view of the DOP’s stance that everything that is not Democratic is racist.

Clearly the HA post was racist, but only a partisan hack would determine that it’s indicative of the whole of the GOP’s constituency agreeing with its message. As an antithesis, one might suggest that all DOP followers support the unceremonious murder of children born live even after a ‘failed’ abortion.

I don’t think Mitch is chuckling this morning in the glow of the HA post. Do you think Long-Thompson is chuckling this morning in the glow of 4000 abortions across the nation yesterday?

stAllio! September 21, 2008 at 9:54 +00006

what the hell is the DOP? the democratic order of planets?

also, did you even read thomas’s comment? because what he wrote is a far cry from what you inferred.

Wilson46201 September 21, 2008 at 10:44 +00006

Speaking of GOP racism: this is the same crowd that couldnt find a single African-American Hoosier to be a Convention Delegate to Minneapolis. Indiana Republicans sent a lily-white group to represent them nationally!

tumbleweed September 21, 2008 at 10:47 +00006

what the hell is the DOP? the democratic order of planets?

That sounds about right–so long as it has nothing to do with this planet or Earthlings.

Ok, so Thomas’ comment… Let’s review, eh?

HA comment = racism
HA comment = conservative view
HA comment = republican view
HA comment = GOP view
HA comment = Daniels
Thus, Daniels is a racist, and hates blacks. He’s ok with Asians, any variety of Hispanics, Serbians, Norwegians, Austrians, Pacific Islanders, Spaniards, Indonesians, Cubans, Brazilians…but he just hates those blacks, especially Obama. Because, he’s so…so…THE COMPETITION.

How convenient that any resistence to Obama’s sewer-dirty connections to various players in the Chicago machine can be pegged by D O P devotees as racism. God forbid we disagree with a candidate that is black. Are all Americans supposed to give him a free pass based on his race?

“They always delete this stuff when they realize that Mitch and the gang — no, not THAT kind of gang — won’t be able to make cute YouTube videos for them anymore if they openly express their latent racism.”

Hmmm…seems to be a near cry.

stAllio! September 21, 2008 at 10:58 +00006

note to tumbleweed: if you’re going to make up nonsense words to refer to people you don’t like, at least try to be clever about it. hell, even democRAT is more clever than “DOP”, which just makes you sound like you don’t know the actual name of the party.

tumbleweed September 21, 2008 at 10:58 +00006

Oh, angry, irrelevant Wilson. Even your own ranks shudder at your dumpster-diving presence.

Should the GOP enlist representatives based on race? Does local government? For the sake of argument, let’s put aside the glory of Gray, Minton-McNeil and Brown. Is Democratic government racially balanced to represent the community? Yes? But for all your wails of “RACISM,” will you be sated when both Dems and Reps are forced to have a mathematically balanced ticket and representation based on race?

Sounds like a recipe for further defining ourselves based on skin color. Isn’t that what you’re supposed to be fighting against?

Wilson46201 September 21, 2008 at 14:27 +00006

umm…when one party obviously excludes Blacks, that’s a pretty damn obvious sign of old-fashioned segregation and bigotry. The GOP has NO African-Americans whatsoever in the Indiana Legislature as well as absolutely no Blacks in the US Congress. Blacks with political elected power are all Democrats.

But tumbleweed keeps rolling along in his desolate 1890’s landscape…

Wilson46201 September 21, 2008 at 14:36 +00006

By the way, Indianapolis is about 1/3 non-white. If the GOP wishes to exclude a third of the electorate from its possibilities of voters, thats just political stupidity and election suicide…

Lou September 21, 2008 at 15:44 +00006

Race can defeat Obama,but I don’t see how it can get him elected. Blacks would vote for anyone white with the same political views Obama has. Isn’t racism voting against someone for his race,not for him for his race? Isn’t racism exclusion based on race? But we’ve all heard the argument that integration is a form in racism. It is one of the ways race is spun on occasion.

Whites voting for whites could be a manifestation of racism under this definition of racism. But maybe I just pointed out why there are those who say that racism is widespread in the USA.It’s all these white people voting for white people.

Mike Kole September 21, 2008 at 18:01 +00006

I’ve always found ‘racism’ to be when one’s actions are motivated by race. Thus, voting for a white person because you are white, as the motivating factor, is racism. Etc.

That doesn’t seem to be the prevailing view, though.

Jason September 21, 2008 at 19:38 +00006

Personally, I find Wilson’s and Lou’s comments about “blacks” offensive as well, though I’m not accusing them of racism. Using “blacks” and “whites” is common terms that almost everyone seems to fall prey to at times, including me.

Grouping people by skin color just needs to stop. Obama isn’t an African-American, he is an American with tan skin.

T September 21, 2008 at 20:04 +00006

Somehow the name “tumbleweed” seems appropriate.

Rev. AJB September 21, 2008 at 21:30 +00006

Dang-guess I need to wear my Obama t-shirt to the gym TWICE this week;-) I promise I will wash it in between wearings. I had it on Firday and was sharing weights with a guy who had on a “God Bless America” t-shirt. Decided not to take off my i-pod and have a conversation with him.

Did any of you see the opening of SNL last night? It was pretty good-McCain approving his ads.

The one ad I liked the best was, “Barack Obama fathered two blach children…in wedlock.”

BTW they forgot that the presidential limo will soon have hydraulics and neon lights on the underside.

Hoosier 1st September 22, 2008 at 8:22 +00006

Ok, and if McCain wins, he’ll have his medic-alert button, his hearing amplifier and his Palin shield to deflect all criticism.

Doug September 22, 2008 at 8:32 +00006

Don’t forget his magic P.O.W. trump card:

Citizen: “Mr. President, you screwed up.”
President: “Screw you, I was a P.O.W.”

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: