{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"A Citizen&#039;s Guide to Indiana","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.masson.us\/blog","author_name":"Doug Masson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.masson.us\/blog\/author\/dougmasson\/","title":"Court of Appeals takes issue with statutory requirement - A Citizen&#039;s Guide to Indiana","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"lxGPjyQ3PA\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.masson.us\/blog\/court-of-appeals-takes-issue-with-statutory-requirement\/\">Court of Appeals takes issue with statutory requirement<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.masson.us\/blog\/court-of-appeals-takes-issue-with-statutory-requirement\/embed\/#?secret=lxGPjyQ3PA\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"&#8220;Court of Appeals takes issue with statutory requirement&#8221; &#8212; A Citizen&#039;s Guide to Indiana\" data-secret=\"lxGPjyQ3PA\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/www.masson.us\/blog\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"The Court of Appeals decided Henriquez v. State (h\/t Indiana Law Blog). One issue was the language of IC 35-38-1-1(b) which provides: When the court pronounces the sentence, the court shall advise the person that the person is sentenced for not less than the earliest release date and for not more than the maximum possible [&hellip;]"}